home   |    about   |    issues   |    get involved   |    guest book   |    links   |    quotes   |    miscellaneous   |    contact   |    talking points   |    contribute   

runoff debate, post debate interview

Channel 4

press conference

Toddlers for Ted v2

Q/A
site best viewed with medium text size- menu:view:text-size
Summary of the 2008 Congressional Campaign
My Life as a Donk


~Being a discourse upon the writer's experiences as a candidate for the Democratic nomination in the SC 4th US Congressional district race, with elaboration upon such insight as he may in the course thereof gained ~

This is a tale of politics.

Send the children away.



Politics is the art of persuasion, generally in practice if not necessarily in principle a confidence game, or con. The immediate task of the politician is not to act in your interest but to convince you he will, and to do so with force sufficient to compel your vote. What your actual interest may be, and how that interest might best be served, is a matter essentially outside this immediate task, and thus substantially immaterial. Politics is generally in practice a con.

The political process is for the most part emotion driven, and the principal impetus of this dynamic is the other, which is to say any person or grouping of persons, real or contrived, outside the particular grouping with whom the individual by virtue of any number of arbitrary criteria identifies. The variations on this theme are essentially endless, but for purposes of the present analysis the principal grouping is Democrat/Republican. Or alternately Republican/Democrat. The analysis is sometimes facilitated by assigning letters:

D = Democrat
R = Republican

further, we may axiomatically assert
D is not equal to R

from which we may logically infer
R is not equal to D

Beyond this, the analysis becomes rather more abstract.

There exists no clearly established objective criteria by which to distinguish D from R, other than that they are clearly separate and distinct letters of the alphabet, which alone would hardly seem to warrant the conflict typically associated with the two groupings, but we may upon reflection assert for purposes of discussion the distinction that D trends toward coercive redistribution of wealth while R trends toward coercive maintenance of the existing distribution. This distinction is probably in actual practice insignificant.

But enough of theory. Let's talk about the primary.



The Primary

A noteworthy feature of the 2008 Congressional primary was the degree to which it was held in secret on the Democratic side. The Republicans had a number of public debates, while the Democrats had none, the writer's diligent efforts otherwise notwithstanding. This relentless lack of debating was accompanied by an equally relentless insistence on the part of the opposing camp that a debate was a thing they naturally desired, if only such could somehow be brought to pass. In the event, it seemed no amount of organizational skill or good intentions over a span of some months could suffice to bring the candidates into the same room for 90 minutes to speak into their respective microphones. How the Republicans managed it remains at this writing a mystery.

An aspect of our play worthy of remark is the transparent dishonesty with which it was acted out by participants and spectators alike. Initially implausible, events progressed to the plainly absurd without the first batted eye on the part of anyone save the writer.

Our story began innocently enough, certainly for politics, ...

It was a dark and stormy night. Outside, the tempest lashed the ancient manor house like a demon possessed, as if in its elemental fury to punish the silent walls for what they hid within.

OK, sorry.

Our moral, and yes we have one, is that the system is broken, by which we mean utterly and irretrievably to its ossified amoral core. The institutions which make up the system, the processes by which they persist, the people whom they ensconce, must on the whole be swept away and replaced. The system cannot be fixed from within. The dichotomy must be redrawn from left/right to rational/irrational, and the rational must mobilize in collective self interest by overtly identifying the irrational as the threat to be collectively countered, necessitating conscious subordination of disparate individual interests to this transcendent collective imperative. Which is really more of a lessons learned than about the primary itself.

Right, the primary ....


- in work -




6/15- After chasing Corden for a debate the past few months it's just too much to read "I have been very interested in debating the issues with Ted". I know we're all supposed to just grin and bear it with politicians, but I've had about enough. Let's just come out and say it, and I know it's going to hurt and I'm not singling him out on this, but if Corden will persistently lie about being all puppy dog eager to debate me then he'll lie about anything. He is fundamentally dishonest. And we have more than enough fundamentally dishonest politicians in Washington already. We don't need any more.

If you want change, voters, look for it inside yourselves. Politics won't change until politicians change, and politicians won't change until you do. If you vote for more of the same, that's what you'll get. Paul Corden and certainly Bob Inglis are more of the same. I'm not. If you want change, vote for it.

sign up for
the phone bank

My opponent Paul Corden is essentially a regular politician. Most if not all of his campaign website could be cut and pasted to or from most any other mainstream campaign site, they tend to read like very long bumper stickers. Corden sees what he considers to be an opportunity and he's taking it. His campaign is about capturing market share. That's what elections are about. He's a marketing guy. That's what they do.

referendum update: Here's the deal. Anybody who didn't vote Republican in the primary can vote in the runoff. Corden got his partisan core yesterday and I think that's most of what he's going to get. We on the other hand have an entire universe of fed up people to tap into. Do the math.

In any event, as I say in the blog I don't think Inglis is beatable from solidly inside the mainstream. Inglis has been a professional politician a fair bit of his life. He knows the business, he has the money. He's a Republican incumbent in a solidly Republican district. He isn't going to be beaten with a running game. If Democrats want a chance to win they have to throw long. I think Corden would get solidly in the 30s, possibly into the 40s. I think I would be somewhere between 30 up potentially past 50, the latter number trending more credible depending on the course of the war and a possible attack on Iran, factors which I would be in a more credible position to exploit than Corden, having written about them in some detail over the past five years. That's the analysis in a nutshell.


  schedule




Christian's best for 4th District
Greenville News, 6/21/08

I have known Ted Christian for five years, and the first time I heard his wit in action I said, "I think I like you." Ted is smart, savvy, well-traveled. He thinks deeply and expresses himself way out of the box. He is willing to go to the wall for what he believes. Ted can win in the general election because he is smart and different. And smart and different is what we need in Washington.

The same old middle-of-the road, ho-hum, avoid-the-issues, weasel and prevaricate stuff we are used to does not work anymore if it ever did.

We can change the 4th District from red to blue. But only if we back a candidate who is not afraid to be different, which is to say honest, up front, say-it-like-it-is without fear, genuine and not connected to any, I say any, special interests or power structures. Sheila Jackson Greer

Sheila Jackson, Greer



6/23, Union Daily Times-


6/14- Union
Kershaw/Lawson wedding

6/20- Corden mailing
go along/get along
should have taught him something
claiming that being a hardcore Democrat is the
only way to win a solidly Republican district is inane
I'm a bad dude
at least I have positions

Paul- too bad you couldn't find time to debate all this with me. Is this how you plan to beat Inglis?
6/24, post election- 32%. I'm not sure how often somebody gets a lower percentage in the runoff than in the primary. It looks like Corden's hit piece did its job. I talked fairly nonstop to voters the last few days and the animosity from a number of them was apparent. It was a cheap shot by a cheap politician. It worked.

Thanks to everybody who helped out. The core fringe discussed future options at Teresa's place this evening.

Ted. Doggonnit. You're not a bad dude, just tryin to be honest in a currupt game of crooked politics. If it means anything to you, YOU have revived my interest in politics. -Alan

lessons learned:
The biggest data point is just how far the system is from an ideal model, which is to say not really in the ballpark. So that's important to know.
$ the price of gas $
campaign blog

7/1- Went to Bob's Ham House talk yesterday, and if he isn't Hayek or JFK he's in the same sentence. Truth doesn't fit in a bottle, Congressman.

6/30- Still can't sleep past 7. After all those years of sloth. That's what running for office does to you.

Leverage the Iran blowback in 2 years?

6/26- I'm off the donk. It was a short ride. I think I'm just not their hierarchy's kind of folks. And they're not mine.

I've never been clubby anyway.

6/24- Back from doing signs, time to GOTV. Hoping for the forties.

6/21- So Corden has come out with a hit mail piece on me (at bottom of site), cherry picking my much larger website a few days before the election so I can't respond, after avoiding a debate the entire race.

Like I said at the start. A regular politician.

6/19- Teresa the campaign manager gave me my label last night, it turns out I'm an "independent democrat". She didn't say if I was an upper or lower case D, but I like the sound of it.

6/18- Corden seems to have gone underground. He's never been particularly responsive, but since the primary his online schedule lists his events without providing a time or place. Which would make them hard to attend.

Running for office has taught me a lot about politics, which I guess it would. For the hardcore partisan it seems there's no such thing as ideological overlap or congruency of views, or even political expediency. You're either with the tribe or you're not.

6/16- People are always asking me what I'm going to do for them, how I'm going to solve their problems, and I try to give them the best answer I can, but let me just say that if you really think Bob Inglis or Paul Corden have a big stack of quick and easy solutions to all your problems then you need to take a closer look. We need to stop electing politicians who say they have all the answers and start electing some who will admit they don't.

6/15- If anybody has any pictures of me dancing at the Kershaw/Lawson wedding last night, yes I'm a politician with an election in 9 days but keep the price reasonable. Is all I'm saying.

6/11-We're inside the gates, boys and girls.

Here's the deal. Anybody who didn't vote Republican in the primary can vote in the runoff. If we split the McCanless vote 66/33, not implausible under the circumstances, it's neck and neck. Corden got the party hard core yesterday, and that's about all he's going to get. We on the other hand have an entire universe of fed up people to tap into. Do the math.

6/10- In a runoff with Corden. The tactical thrust is to keep hitting him on the debate he won't have. The strategic thrust is change. If you want it, vote for it.

6/8- Made my first campaign promise this morning speaking at Shady Oak Baptist Church, I told them if I became a Congressman I would come back and give them a sermon based on my experiences in Washington. I'm not Rev. Barton, but I'll have a go at it.

6/7- Just cleared 13480 robocalls, didn't want to go there but Corden decided to so I followed, here's the message. Liz Patterson endorses Corden in his message. Because he's the Party's man. Go along. Get along. Faced the VC but wouldn't face me.

If you want change, vote for it.

6/5- So I hear the shtick with Corden's mailing is that he's "the true Democrat", leaving me by implication the false Democrat, though I'm of course unnamed, and I also understand the only way to win the solidly Republican upstate is to be solidly Democrat, whatever that means exactly. It apparently involves indulging in wishful electoral strategizing and making nonspecific partisan insinuations.

6/3- Spoke to the Union County Motorsports Association this evening, they're kind of a lodge for motorheads, yard sign guy Ron Henderson hooked me up with them. Found out when I got to town I was front page news, with picture.

I suppose if I become a Congressman I'll get used to this sort of thing.

6/2- Busy day in Union, scheduled to go back tomorrow at 7. Met with the Greenville Baptist Minister's Association this evening, need to write about it.

6/1- Bob McLain of WORD said he never heard back from my opponents about an on air debate. Two Democratic candidates for the US Congress didn't even have the fortitude to respond to his invitation. Why hasn't anybody heard a WORD about it?

And Bush, at Furman, urges 'culture of responsibility'.

Be careful what you wish for, Mr. President.

5/29- NOT ENDORSED BY THE GREENVILLE NEWS!

Let's face it, the chance that the Greenville News was going to endorse a candidate with enough sense to oppose the war ... well, it is to laugh.

And yeah, Paul's "the most knowledgeable candidate". Guess he just didn't want to show me up in a debate.

Like I wrote back in March-
"The Greenville News clearly considers Paul the lesser of two Democratic evils.

Why settle for the lesser of two evils?"

5/28- Turns out WORD is all talk.

5/27- I was on my way out the door running late to the Young Democrats candidate meet and greet at the Handlebar this evening when someone called to tell me how great he thought my talk on Channel 4 was, it had just aired and he looked up my number. The rest of the story is that he was a Republican. So if I make it through the primary, the general election might actually be easier.

5/26- Spent the day in Union, had an interview with the Union Daily Times, visited the radio station, put out yard signs and talked to people. It's a nice town. And $2.85 for the jumbo frank plate at Hearts is hard to beat.

5/23- The Channel 4 taping went OK I think, it airs Tuesday at the end of the 5:00 news. I still think politicians are overpaid, but not as much as I used to.

5/21- Beyond simple supply and demand, the skyrocketing price of oil is being driven principally by speculation over Bush attacking Iran.

5/19- Filming with Channel 4 Friday, have a debate in the works with WORD.

5/16- The latest rumor, and I've heard it from two independent sources, but the word is that I'm a fundamentalist Republican. So how about that. Gotta love politics.

5/13- In something of a public flame war with camp Corden over the debate, or lack of it. Got a $200 check, the largest so far.

5/12- Need to do a shoot for Channel 7, still pushing for a debate.

5/9- I dealt with the Sudanese government some years ago. The UN should put a gun to the Myanmar government's head and tell it to get out of the way.

5/6- Had an interview with the Greenville News today, and Channel 4 called for me to come in and give them some footage. Russell set up the facebook page yesterday, and I met with Jonathan the media planner.

It's all definitely not rocket science. But it's hopefully close enough.

4/29- Went to the debate last night between Inglis and Jeter, put on by the Young Republicans. The format seemed to work fairly well, with impromptu rebuttal and reasonable restraint instead of a formal structure and time limits. Inglis displayed all of the footwork that has him running for a sixth term, and Jeter did well, particularly for a first effort. He may not have Inglis's experience, but at least he's not running on his record.

In other news Monday, 4 US Soldiers, 43 Iraqis Killed; 112 Iraqis Wounded.

4/21- Went to the Republican 4th district convention this evening, and I had thought to just loiter around the fringe but it turns out that's hard to do when you can't find the center. All the nonparticipants were initially supposed to sit on the stage. Not making that up.

4/20- Had breakfast this morning with Griff at Stax, and who else would happen along but one of the two other candidates, Bryan McCanless, who I hadn't met. Griff had to rush off to church, Bryan ended up missing it. He's an interesting guy.

4/17- Say what you want about Jimmy Carter, and a lot of people do, but he was certainly the most decent President this country has had in my lifetime. If he wants to talk to Hamas or Fatah or the devil himself I have no doubt he's doing it out of sincere conviction, and it's a testament to the stranglehold the Israeli lobby has on the levers in this country that he can be so thoroughly shunned for it not just by the Republicans and the media, but by his own alleged party as well.

In other news, 250 yard signs were ordered today and should be ready Tuesday. A campaign event is being planned, in part to distribute them.

4/15- Yesterday evening's Democratic party meeting took an unexpected turn, when a gentleman took such offense at the words on this very website that he rose and read them aloud before the people assembled.

And the words went from being on the internet to being spoken openly at a public meeting. And you couldn't help but notice that the world went right on spinning. And not only that, but there seemed a general consensus that the truth was something we might discuss more.

4/9- Griff, the previous nominee, has been working on setting up a debate, but word now is Paul doesn't want to participate. Maybe send him some encouragement. Because if he can't handle it here, he won't be able to handle it in Washington.

4/5- The details of the Bear Stearns deal are of course too complicated and arcane and otherwise shrouded to more than casually contemplate, per which the general impression is one of people in suits making money, in this instance with the active intervention of the US government, but the one detail that sticks in my mind is the buyout going from 2 to 10 dollars over a weekend, a 500% increase. And I've been in a few buyouts, from both shareholder ends. And that just doesn't happen.

4/1- Out on the campaign trail today, and on the way home I stopped at Snapshot Cafe and managed to arrive shortly before a debate being held by Furman students on the question "Do Democrats Have All the Answers". I can't say for sure which way my input swung it, but if this level of blind luck holds, the campaign should go well.

3/31- Just back from the kickoff press conference.

It didn't go badly.

addendum
So my headline in the Greenville News is 4th District race gets third Democrat, or at least I think that's my headline. It's above an article about me. I actually filed first, the day before Corden and two weeks before McCanless.

The money quote comes from county GOP chairman Samuel Harms, in response to my observation about US military expenditures exceeding that of every other nation on earth combined. "I hope he keeps it up," he said. "That’s not a winning theme in this district."

Because see, kids, it's not about hard numbers and objective reality, national debt and legitimate defensive need, flag draped coffins and missing limbs. It's about "winning themes". It is plainly a marketing game for them. And make no mistake that no one else's sacrifice is too great to win it.

addendum to the addendum
So now my headline is Christian kicks off 4th District campaign.

Which is correct.


3/26- The Greenville News clearly considers Paul the lesser of two Democratic evils.

Why settle for the lesser of two evils?

3/25- Paul Corden, the only other candidate so far registered for the primary, put up his website today. I'll be posting a review within the next few days, but as I've been saying in conversation, my impression is that Inglis isn't beatable from inside the mainstream. Inglis has been a professional politician a fair bit of his life. He knows the business, he has the money. He's a Republican incumbent in a solidly Republican district. He isn't going to be beaten with a running game. If Democrats want to win, they have to go to the air. I think Paul could get solidly in the 30s, maybe up into the 40s. I think I would be somewhere between 20 up into the 50s. That's it in a nutshell.

3/21- Bush declared Wednesday in a propaganda speech beamed into Iran that the Iranian government has "declared they want to have a nuclear weapon to destroy people, some in the Middle East", which I think raises the question of whether its OK for our President to use government money to broadcast wild, eye-bulging lies.

3/17- Just back from Bob's Ham House talk on the economy, and it turns out what's needed is "confidence". Maybe we can get some at WalMart.

And Bob's for telecom immunity because the phone companies "cooperated", or as the mafia says, "cooperated".

And when it comes to earmarks stay a pig, don't be a hog, or very nearly those actual words to whatever effect.

3/12/08 (AFP)-"I want to assure you -- just like I assure military families and the troops -- the politics of 2008 is not going to enter into my calculation, it is the peace of years to come that will enter into my calculation," he pledged to a Christian broadcasters association.

"They're not coming home based upon defeat, or based upon opinion polls, or based upon focus groups, or based upon politics, they're coming home because we're successful," he said, to thunderous applause.


Here's a news flash, Mr. President- it looks like Obama will probably win, and when he does he's going to promptly close the books on your six year blood shower. But until then you just keep right on grinding, spunky.

3/11/08- Went to the party convention yesterday evening, and let's talk about what wasn't talked about- the objectively grotesque military budget, the semi official demise of the bill of rights, the nation's steady decent into abject usury, the fairly third world decline of the dollar, the codification of torture, and that our President is a bloodsoaked nitwit. None of those things were mentioned. We said the pledge, sang the national anthem, prayed twice, and debated the colors on the party logo.

3/6/08- Had coffee this afternoon with Paul Corden, a fellow potential 4th congressional district democratic nominee candidate. We got together with Griff to talk politics and maybe do some ad hoc power brokering, whatever that would look like. Paul looks the part, and with a law degree, ground combat experience, and a background in marketing, central casting could have sent over a lot worse. My impression is we don't have differences in ideology so much as a distinction in how far down the sleeve to wear it. Paul and Griff trend toward pragmatic, I trend toward ... well, I guess I'd have to characterize it as less pragmatic, though I'm not sure our positions aren't in fact functionally reversed. I think under the circumstances the most pragmatic approach may be to throw pragmatism to the winds. I have no hard numerical data on this.

It will be interesting to see what Paul puts on his website.

And re: the killings in the previous entry, it turns out they apparently murdered the wrong uncharged people, three women and three children. The intended victim was one Saleh Ali Saleh Nabhan, wanted by the FBI for questioning. No one seems to have pointed this out so I'll do it here, but a cruise missile is rather an awkward instrument of interrogation.

The bombing targeted a "facility where there were known terrorists", a government term for "huts full of people".

The White House stressed its intention to "go after" anyone and anyone affiliated with anyone "plotting and planning ... to inflict terror". The villagers for their part "fled in fear of another attack".

The Bush administration is out of control.

3/3/08- The Israelis keep some number of big plays mapped out, and the time to act on one would be while Bush is still in office, depending on how much they think remains to get out of him and whether they think Obama is going to win. The big play might involve some sort of attempted final solution to the Palestinian problem and/or an attack on Iran, possibly with nuclear weapons, which the Israelis may decide need to be actively introduced.

Yes, the big play would be a bad idea. That may stop them. It may not.

And Ahmadinejad just finished the first state visit ever made to Iraq by an Iranian leader. Bush really is the great uniter.

And the latest terminally guided killing warrants a comment on the American government's shift away from the rule of law. Our government now routinely kills people suspected of connections to groups tied to or believed to be engaged in activities in support of terrorist related etc. etc. etc.. No one is charged, no one is convicted, no one is sentenced. A decision is simply made somewhere, a missile is simply launched, and people in this or that faraway country are simply murdered. That the murdering entity doesn't bother with its own elaborate and expensively maintained court system doesn't seem to matter to anyone of any significance, and that the murdering entity in fact gets the guilt of entire nations wrong doesn't seem to matter either. And morality aside, make no mistake that one dark facet of this dark gem is that the high tech murder anywhere at anytime for any reason paradigm will not remain a one way street.

2/29/08- Telecom immunity is bad, but can Congress actually pass a law retroactively immunizing a private entity from civil liability in an ongoing action? What's a judge supposed to do with that?

It's called the rule of law, and like them or not it seems the Bush administration has pretty well dispensed with it.

2/27/08- Anybody else notice al-Sadr just extended his cease fire until two months before the election? What's up with that? Doesn't he know we're going to be busy with political stuff then?

But never mind that. Friends, Romans, coconspirators, settle no longer for getting your news from an ivory tower, because Beth at the Greenville News is now literally relaying it from Babel.

Maybe we really are on some preordained apocalypse gig.

2/26/08- I notice Paul Harvel's cartoon about Bob's new video is a reproduction.

2/23/08- Anybody besides me notice Turkey has invaded Iraq and our embassy in Serbia was looted yesterday?

2/22/08- Got an email from Bob this morning about his new video/campaign theme Get Down with Bob, and I'm actually at kind of a loss to parody it. And to be honest, I kind of feel like making fun of Bob is my turf and I don't need the competition. To be even more honest, his email arrived at the same time as an email with the news that Shriners has decided to accept Rusul for treatment. Rusul is an Iraqi girl who was injured in the war. She and her uncle will hopefully be here soon, and it looks like the decision is going to be to cut her foot off. And it's just not funny.

2/18/08- Back from Bob's Ham House talk, and let's just say it- the Republicans have screwed up so bad that like as not a black man with a Moslem name is going to be the next President. This awful reality hung palpably in the air, unspoken if not unmuttered, and no passing slogan nor wanly whistled tune could dispel its terrible onrush.

Turns out their big problem is a charisma deficit, so that they must now by way of remedy attempt to sell their war "winsomely", and I'm not making that up. I don't recall how they plan to sell everything else, but the prospect of selling a war winsomely sticks in my mind as perhaps the most novel marketing scheme in the long and colorful history of the discipline.

But for the cost, it would be a hoot.

2/6/08- Watched the clip of Bob on Colbert, and it was an appropriate venue to discuss his idea about a 35 foot high concrete wall along the Mexican border. As I put it in an email, it's probably more brainless than fascist. But I don't suppose practicality is much of a consideration.

Marketing, baby.

Marketing.

1/31/08- It looks like health care is going to be the big framing effort for Bob, which makes sense. It wasn't going to be the economy or immigration, and certainly not the war. Yes, health care is a mess, and no you couldn't realistically expect the Republicans to correct it, seeing as how they've overseen the descent, but at least it isn't a catastrophic failure, and who's to confidently say the Democrats wouldn't have done worse.

We aren't going to have socialized medicine in this country, there's too much money involved. We'll probably continue to slide that general direction, but we won't go so far as to materially impact the corporate bottom line, at least not anytime soon. Both parties are going to continue to pursue business as usual, and what's left of the free market will continue to try and cope. Get used to it.

1/18/08- Today's political phrase that pays is "economic stimulus", which coming from politicians means some variation on one or the other of the government's two basic tricks of taking or spending money, the conventional wisdom being that less of the first and more of the second is good for the economy. Of course anybody with a credit card can tell you where this will eventually lead, except that since the government can't exactly go "bankrupt" it instead sinks into "massive crippling debt", which leads to "runaway inflation". Which I suppose would call for the opposite of "economic stimulus", whatever the phrase for that is.

1/15/08- Had lunch with Griff today, and I think his idea about a federal community service program has merit, only I wouldn’t make it compulsory. It occurred to me talking about it that it could maybe get two or three birds with one stone if it was structured right. Such a program would be Constitutional if it was voluntary and if it employed people in pursuit of legitimate Constitutional ends, though let’s be clear that those legitimate ends don’t include giving the nation’s unfocused youth something to do, though I think that’s a fine side benefit. But perhaps the larger benefit of a correctly structured program might be to help revitalize the federal government with a steady infusion of youthful energy and ideas in place of the current ossification. Young people might come away from the program with an increased sense of maturity and purpose, and who’s to say the government might not do the same.

We also talked about the economy, and I’m supposed to come up with something to do about it. It’s the burger and fries of politics to make sweeping campaign promises about the economy, when in fact politicians actually have very little if any direct control over it. The truth is that the economy is basically just people doing things for each other, generally for money. The process requires a common transportation infrastructure, a regulatory playing field, and a medium of exchange, and the government helps the economy in such measure as it effectively and predictably provides these things. Beyond that, the government is in fact a demonstrable drain on the economy. Take as a particularly bad example the trillion dollars spent so far in Iraq. What do we have to show for it? Do we have a trillion dollars worth of roads or bridges? Do we have a trillion dollars worth of factories, homes, or food? No, we have a trillion dollars worth of corpses and a trillion dollars worth of ill will dragging down our exports to the rest of the world, along with the added drain of the usual wartime inflation. So be wary when these same architects tell you what they’re going to do for the economy.


campaign news

"Crestfallen campaign update"
Daisy's Dead Air, June 26, 2008

"Corden wins District 4 runoff"
Greenville News, June 25, 2008

"Christian's best for 4th District"
Greenville News, June 21, 2008

"RUNOFF ELECTION FOR TED!"
Daisy's Dead Air, June 11, 2008

"Energy, Iraq on candidates' minds"
Spartanburg Herald-Jrnl, June 9, 2008

"Christian disagrees with Inglis on energy"
Union Daily Times, June 3, 2008

"Twisting words"
Spartanburg Herald-Jrnl, June 2, 2008

"America's military too large, Congressional hopeful says"
Union Daily Times, June 2, 2008

"Inglis, Corden are top picks in 4th District race" Greenville News, May 29, 2008

Channel 4 video, May 23, 2008

Channel 7 video, May 16, 2008

"Taken out of context"
Spartanburg Herald-Jrnl, May 23, 2008

"It DOES take a rocket scientist!"
Daisy's Dead Air, May 15, 2008

"On 4/25, a letter was published supporting Ted Christian ..." Spartanburg Herald-Jrnl, May 4, 2008

"Christian for Congress!"
Daisy's Dead Air, April 18, 2008

"Democrat with coffers bare seeking Inglis' seat" Spartanburg Herald-Jrnl, April 8, 2008

"Upstate progressive throws hat into ring" SC Prog Blog, April 7, 2008

"Christian kicks off 4th District campaign"
Greenville News, March 31, 2008

"Local interest in 4th District high on both sides" Greenville News, March 30, 2008

"Two Democrats file for 4th District race"
Greenville News, March 20, 2008

how you can help
 put out a yard sign
 canvas
 phone bank
 spread the word

Sharon says:
Thank you very much for being honest with me. I will do what I can to see you get elected. Please send me signs and let me know how I can help.

Ann says:
... just gave your business card (last night) to one of my colleagues who's with me and lives in Greenville (actually not far from you). I was talking to her about your campaign and you have the votes of her and her husband. I think you just might pull this off, Ted!

Ed says:
It’s great to see someone take on Inglis. Wish I could vote for this guy. We need some new blood, new ideas. Maybe we really are ready for change.


Ever had a US Congressional candidate in your own home? Well now's your chance!
Host a candidate meet and greet!
quote of the week:
Two steps forward, one step back.
-Mao Zedong  



I will be leafletting for Ted and busting my butt before the primary. He is a shaft of sunlight peeping through the door, a harbinger of a new Upstate that thrives on diversity and real debate. He signifies that the 4th district has come of age and is ready to entertain some actual political argument. GO TED! -daisy

Serena says:
By all means, if you think things are great and that government is doing a very fine job go ahead and send one more typical politician to Washington. But if you think that it's time for a change, if you think that it's time that we begin to send Congress a message that we want change, then vote for someone who actually would be a change. Vote for Ted Christian.

John says:
After reading your thoughts on nuclear weapons, Guantanamo, the economy, social security, and so much more, you have my full support.

Gwynn T says:
You are definitely a small ray of hope in a big ugly place (politics) that I have long ago started to ignore. ... Thank you, and good luck... I'm gonna go pick out a shirt.

Steve says:
Great site. It took me getting my picture on there to go to it. I'm going to send it to my friends.

Jennifer says:
you go for it, ted!

"B" (a Republican) says:
If you make it that far, I'll vote for you.

Jack Taylor says:
We need his mind at work in Washington.

Daisy says:
Wow--he cleans up real good! Who knew?
Antiwar activist and all-round swell guy Ted Christian is running for Congress, South Carolina 4th district. The district Democratic primary is June 10th. If you are local, vote for him. If not, send him money!

Pike “Draft Bust” Spice says:
He thinks like the people. :)
Head To Head
   
An executive summary for the busy voter


Tech World
If you're concerned about things like renewable energy, global warming, and nuclear power, this is essentially a nonstarter. If you want a lease for a strip mall, talk to a real estate lawyer like Bob. If you want somebody who understands something about technology and where it might be headed, talk to an engineer.

Iraq
This is also something of a nonstarter. Bob has yet to understand the war in Iraq, while I and others saw where it was going before it started.

The Economy
Like I say in the issues section, it still doesn't seem likely but I've made a living the past two decades investing in most every industry you can think of. Bob his for years made his living taxing them.

Perspective
I've seen more of the world than Bob, and I didn't see it from the back of an armored SUV.

Integrity
Bob is a one time lawyer and career politician who started his career by solemnly pledging he wouldn't have one, and that he wouldn't take any PAC money while he didn't. It's now gone past a career into a full blown family affair. On the other hand, read this website. If you notice me spinning the truth anywhere, let me know.

Ethics
Bob is an enabling party to torture and aggressive war. I'm not.

Fiscal Responsibility
Bob's never voted for a balanced budget. I paid off my student loans early.

Health Care
With the exception of one buyout in the 90s, I've never lost money in a health care stock. The problem with health care is the HMO industry. The problem with the HMO industry is that it's a problematic business model facilitated by a bought and paid for government. This won't change until politicians do, and I don't mean just the faces.

Here are some of Bob's medical industry donors, I stopped at "C":
3M
American Family Life Assurance Company
American Dental Association
American Medical Association
American Society of Interventional Pain
Corning Incorporated

has a global perspective






cute kid shot
Shady Oak Baptist Church

site last updated: July 1

contact: ted@christianforcongress.com

Christian for Congress Campaign, PO Box 2844, Greenville, SC 29602